COVID-19 Aftermath: Direction Towards Universal Health Coverage in Low-Income Countries Comment on "Health Coverage and Financial Protection in Uganda: A Political Economy Perspective".

Progressive realization of universal health coverage (UHC) requires health systems capacity to provide quality service and financial risk protection which supports access to services without financial hardship. Government health spending in low-income countries (LICs) has been low and heavily relied on external donor resources and out-of-pocket payment. This has resulted in high prevalence of catastrophic health spending or foregone care by those who cannot afford. Under fiscal constraints posed by pandemic, reforms in LICs should focus on efficiency through health resource waste reduction. Targeting the poor even with low level of health spending can make a significant health gain. Investment in primary healthcare and health workforce is the foundation for realizing UHC which cannot be postponed. Innovative tax on health hazardous products, conditional debt relief can increase fiscal space for health; while international collaboration to accelerate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine coverage can bring LICs out of acute phase of pandemic.

Advancing the partnership between Japan and Thailand on global health and UHC: "new normal" approach during COVID-19 pandemic

Summary Partnerships, particularly, South-South and Triangular Cooperation play an important role in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The Partnership Project for Global Health and Universal Health Coverage (UHC) between Japan and Thailand (the Project) was launched in 2016 as a four-year flagship project for Triangular Cooperation and continued to the second phase in 2020. Participating countries include Asian and African countries who are striving to drive global health and to move towards UHC. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has made coordination of partnerships more difficult. The Project needed to find a "new normal" approach to conduct our collaborative work. Struggling with public health and social measures for COVID-19 has made us more resilient and has increased opportunities to collaborate more closely. In the past year and a half, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Project successfully conducted a number of online activities between Thailand and Japan and with other countries on global health and UHC. Our "new normal" approach led continuing dialogue of networking both at the project implementation and policy levels, focusing on desk-based activities regarding the targets and the objectives of the project and creating a golden opportunity for pursuing a timely second phase. Our lessons learned include as follows: i) Closer prior consultation is required to hold satisfactory online meetings;ii) Effective "new normal" approaches include emphasizing practical and interactive discussions on each countrys priority issues and expanding target participants;iii) Commitment, trust, teamwork, and sharing common goals can enhance and sustain partnerships, especially amid the pandemic.

Learning from pandemic responses: Informing a resilient and equitable health system recovery in Thailand.

This article is part of the Research Topic 'Health Systems Recovery in the Context of COVID-19 and Protracted Conflict'. The third quarter of 2022 saw COVID-19 cases and deaths in Thailand reduced significantly, and high levels of COVID-19 vaccine coverage. COVID-19 was declared an "endemic" disease, and economic activities resumed. This paper reviews pre-pandemic health systems capacity and identifies pandemic response strengths, weaknesses and lessons that guided resilient and equitable health system recovery. Robust health systems and adaptive strategies drive an effective pandemic response. To support health system recovery Thailand should (1) minimize vulnerability and extend universal health coverage to include migrant workers and dependents; (2) sustain provincial primary healthcare (PHC) capacity and strengthen PHC in greater Bangkok; (3) leverage information technology for telemedicine and teleconsultation; (4) enhance and extend case and event-based surveillance of notifiable diseases, and for public health threats, including pathogens with pandemic potential in wildlife and domesticated animals. This requires policy and financial commitment across successive governments, adequate numbers of committed and competent health workforce at all levels supported by over a million village health volunteers, strong social capital and community resilience. A strengthened global health architecture and international collaboration also have critical roles in establishing local capacities to develop and manufacture pandemic response products through transfer of technology and know-how. Countries should engage in the ongoing Inter-government Negotiating Body to ensure a legally binding instrument to safeguard the world from catastrophic impacts of future pandemics.

Learning from pandemic responses: Informing a resilient and equitable health system recovery in Thailand

This article is part of the Research Topic ‘Health Systems Recovery in the Context of COVID-19 and Protracted Conflict'. The third quarter of 2022 saw COVID-19 cases and deaths in Thailand reduced significantly, and high levels of COVID-19 vaccine coverage. COVID-19 was declared an "endemic” disease, and economic activities resumed. This paper reviews pre-pandemic health systems capacity and identifies pandemic response strengths, weaknesses and lessons that guided resilient and equitable health system recovery. Robust health systems and adaptive strategies drive an effective pandemic response. To support health system recovery Thailand should (1) minimize vulnerability and extend universal health coverage to include migrant workers and dependents;(2) sustain provincial primary healthcare (PHC) capacity and strengthen PHC in greater Bangkok;(3) leverage information technology for telemedicine and teleconsultation;(4) enhance and extend case and event-based surveillance of notifiable diseases, and for public health threats, including pathogens with pandemic potential in wildlife and domesticated animals. This requires policy and financial commitment across successive governments, adequate numbers of committed and competent health workforce at all levels supported by over a million village health volunteers, strong social capital and community resilience. A strengthened global health architecture and international collaboration also have critical roles in establishing local capacities to develop and manufacture pandemic response products through transfer of technology and know-how. Countries should engage in the ongoing Inter-government Negotiating Body to ensure a legally binding instrument to safeguard the world from catastrophic impacts of future pandemics.

Universal access to comprehensive COVID-19 services for everyone in Thailand.

Despite Thailand having had universal health coverage (UHC) with comprehensive benefit packages since 2002, services are neither listed nor budget earmarked for COVID-19 responses. Policy decisions were made immediately after the first outbreak in 2020 to fully fund a comprehensive benefit package for COVID-19. The Cabinet approved significant additional budget to respond to the unfolding pandemic. The comprehensive benefit package includes laboratory tests, contact tracing, active case findings, 14-day quarantine measures (including tests, food and lodging), field hospitals, ambulance services for referral, clinical services both at hospitals and in home and community isolation, vaccines and vaccination cost, all without copayment by users. No-fault compensation for adverse events or deaths following vaccination is also provided. Services were purchased from qualified public and private providers using the same rate, terms and conditions. The benefit package applies to everyone living in Thailand including Thai citizens and migrant workers. A standardised and comprehensive COVID-19 benefit package for Thai and non-Thai population without copayment facilitates universal and equitable access to care irrespective of capacity to pay and social status and nationality, all while aiming to supporting pandemic containment. Making essential services available, notably laboratory tests, through the engagement of qualified both public and private sectors boost supply side capacity. These policies and implementations in this paper are useful lessons for other low-income and middle-income countries on how UHC reinforces pandemic containment.

Thailand's COVID-19: How public financial management facilitated effective and accountable health sector responses

Effective Public Financial Management (PFM) systems are crucial during COVID-19 pandemic to ensure timely mobilisation of sufficient resources and distribution to frontline service providers. All aspects of PFM, from budget acquisition to execution and expenditure reporting and auditing are important aspects in pursuing effective pandemic responses with transparency and accountability. This commentary analyzes how PFM in Thailand adapted to support purchasing of COVID-19 health services, including laboratories and treatment, vaccines and vaccination servicing, and no-fault compensation from adverse effects following immunisation. It also discusses the limitations which delay implementation. Financing COVID-19 services was decided by the Cabinet under a State of Emergency Decree, resulting in expedited budget approval process. Though delays in budget execution were caused by bureaucratic budget spending rules, regulations and approvals, PFM adaptation allowed for services to be provided through the use of hospital revenue with rapid budget execution rules and regulations while maintaining accountability, reporting and auditing. Lastly, while reporting is mandatory with internal audit by related government agencies, and external audit by Office of the Auditor General in place, as of September 2021, report of the COVID-19 expenditure in 2020 has yet to be made publicly available for transparency and check and balance by the public. It is unclear the degree to which audit systems are fully enforced. Overall, Thailand's PFM systems have provided rapid fund mobilisation sourcing from central budget and loans and clarity in authorisation of spending;the use of hospital revenue provides more flexibility and rapid budget execution.